European Parliament committee adopts digital services law * TorrentFreak
Home > Law and Politics >
EU plans to modernize copyright in Europe are advancing. The Parliamentary Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) has just adopted a draft new law on digital services. This brings the implementation of various new copyright restrictions, including quick 30-minute takings and requirements to deal with “repeat infringers,” one step closer.
In recent years, the European Commission has proposed and adopted various legislative changes to help combat online piracy.
This includes the Copyright Directive which was passed in 2019 as well as the Digital Services Act, which was officially unveiled last December.
With respect to the DSA, none of the âpartiesâ are fully satisfied with the proposed legislation. Copyright holders believe it doesn’t go far enough, while others warn the proposal will lead to more download filters, restricting people’s freedom of expression.
JURI adopts digital services law
Over the past few months, various stakeholders have lobbied lawmakers for improvements. Various changes were also proposed by groups in the European Parliament, which ultimately resulted in a compromise proposal which was adopted today by the European Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee (JURI).
The process of voting on individual proposals was preceded by a lively debate with quite a bit of hindsight, mainly from the Greens / ALE and S&D groups. This included the introduction of a quick opt-out process for hacked live streams, which should be removed within 30 minutes.
Opposition included Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer, who was one of ten members who voted against the quick-withdrawal proposal, like Breyer himself Underline on Twitter.
The DSA also introduces strict removal deadlines for other âillegalâ content, which must be removed within 72 hours. At the same time, this will allow âconfidence signalsâ to gain preferential treatment in the withdrawal process.
Earlier this week, several civil society groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warned MPs against this system of “confidence signaling”, which they believe is unfair.
âPlatforms shouldn’t be forced to apply one set of rules to ordinary users and a more permissive set of rules to influence accounts and politicians. First-class treatment for sources and notifications from non-independent authorities or business entities should be rejected, âthe letter read.
These and other concerns did not prevent the JURI committee from voting in favor of the draft proposal. While there is still a long way to go before the DSA is approved by the European Parliament, it has certainly gone one step further.
More hindsight to come
Not all copyright owners are happy with the current text either, as they believe it does not go far enough. They want to further increase the liability of online service providers, for example, who should ensure that infringing content cannot reappear online after it is removed.
Others believe that the current proposals already go too far. This includes Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer who fears the current proposal will lead to more “error-prone” download filters.
âAlgorithms cannot reliably identify illegal content and currently consistently results in the deletion of legal content, including multimedia content. The reappearance of content may be legal in a new context, for a new purpose, or published by another author, ânotes Breyer.
The digital services law does not require services to implement download filters. However, Breyer and others fear that this is indeed the result of the new proposals.
If we take a look at the controversy surrounding past copyright proposals in the EU, such as ACTA and copyright law, we can expect more backlash from both sides in the months to come. to come.